Rangers deals Celtic a transfer blow, but the jury determines who actually won the January transfer window.

After the transfer window closed, who is in better shape—Celtic or Rangers?

Andy Newport: Since acquiring Oscar Cortes, Mohamed Diomande, and Fabio Silva a month ago,

the Ibrox team is clearly in better shape. However, the Rangers fanbase still believes they could have used

one more striker to put a serious pressure on a Celtic team that appears exposed following their lackluster transfer window.

Michael Mannon: Rangers performed admirably, but their inability to sign a striker could prove costly,

absolving Celtic of responsibility for a disastrous window. The door is ajar because the Hoops left it open.

FRASER WILSON: Rangers’ three new additions appear to outnumber Celtic’s two, meaning the Ibrox team. However,

I believed that both teams needed a goal scorer, and if Adam Idah can get out to a quick start, the Hoops will be difficult to stop.

Looking back over the course of the month, which elite team performed the best?

ANDY: While the Hibs have undoubtedly supported Nick Montgomery by adding seven new players, I believe that Hearts’

decision to hold onto Lawrence Shankland may have been their best move. Bojan Miovski’s retention by Aberdeen

will also be a huge plus for whoever manages the Dons.

MICHAEL: Dundee had an amazing window, but Killie looked in excellent shape. With the return of Owen Beck and the arrival of Micky Mellon,

they might be aiming for Europe. Who knows about Hibs following a wave of new signings?

FRASER: With seven new players joining the team, the Hibs have undoubtedly shaken things up,

but time will tell how effective that has been. Dundee and Hearts have both brought a little amount of quality.

However, Kilmarnock’s acquisition of Kevin Van Veen resulted in a deadline-day sensation that might

perhaps secure them a spot in the European Union.

Get more related news on… https://dailysportnews.co.uk/